Monday, February 27, 2012

Ethnic Studies and Book Ban in Tucson Arizona 2012

This will be part one of a two part blog covering the new law banning ethnic studies and banning books such as Shakespeares the Tempest from the high school curriculum in Tucson Unified School Districts.
 In 2006 labor rights activist Dolores Huerta told Tucson High Magnet School students that "Republicans hate Mexicans". In reaction to this then Superintendent of public instruction Tom Horne sent deputy superintendent Margaret Dugan to explain to the students why Huerta was wrong.  The students felt frustration at not being allowed to ask Dugan questions. They placed tape on thier mouths and more than 200 students walked out on the speech. Horne investigated about how these students learned about free speech and civil disobedience. Horne decided that this knowledge came from their Mexican American studies classes. Thus HB 2281 was launched. Around the time that Huerta spoke to the students a series of bills were being passed such as SB 1070 which we read about in another classmates blog this semester. These legislative attacks were aimed at enforcing borders and antiimmigrant sentiment. Huertas aim in telling the students that republicans hate mexicans was an effort to have the children look at and challenge them.  Senator John Huppenthal successfully ran for state superintendent with the platform stating he would eliminate Raza studies. La Raza being a term used by the Chicano Movement meaning "the people".
The origins of the Tucson Mexican American studies department was a response to student drop out rates and low test scores. the Department of Education hired the Cambium group to audit the program. the Cambium report found that students were doing better in school and that the classes
increased the likelihood that students would graduate and go on to college. Students even began to perform better outside of the classes such as math. Teaching kids their history affirms and supports their performance in and out of the class room. Personally ethnic studies gave me a voice and affirmed that i had a role in my education. I learned that there are others like me and we too have the power to create knowledge.  I learned to think critically about issues in and outside my community. Sandra Cisneros wrote "One day i will pack my bags of books and paper. One day i will say goodbye to Mango. I am too strong for her to keep me here forever. One day i will go away. Friends and neighbors will say, What happened to that Esperanza? Where did she go with all those books and paper? why did she march so far away? They will not know I have gone away to come back.  For the ones I left behind. For the ones who cannot out".




http://colorlines.com/

further readings/reference
Sandra Cisneros banned book The House on Mango Street
Pedagogy of The Oppressed Paulo Freire

What's Race Got to Do With It? Critical Race Theory's Conflicts With and Connections to Qualitative Research Methodology and Epitemology
Laurence Parker and Marvin Lynn

3 comments:

  1. Martha, this was a very interesting post. The ethnic studies ban is definitely a youth and justice issue. I find it interesting that some people believe ethnic studies teaches students to hate white people. When I was in school, back in the Stone Ages, we had to take one year of Texas history. We read about the Alamo. Mexicans were always the villains and the "Texans" were always the good guys despite evidence to the contrary. I didn't question this depiction until much later. As you can guess, I strongly disagree with the ethnic studies ban. Knowledge is power. Thank you for sharing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for sharing this, Martha! I didn't know about it, and I think it is an important issue that I definitely want to seek more information about. It seems ludicrous that anyone now would believe that limiting education and understanding is a solution to any problem. The statement that it is anti-American is equally as ridiculous.

    It was interesting to watch the video of the students rallying against the ban. Whether this is right or wrong, I found myself a little disappointed that the students were not encouraged to appear more professional. It is hard enough being heard as a teenager, and unfortunately physical appearance makes a strong impression. I worry that that particular group of students lost some credibility because their appearance was more "rebellious teen" and less "educated and concerned adolescent", if that makes any sense.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Amy, you bring up an excellent point. I recently witnessed some MEChA students who were protesting against a proposed name change of the Chicano/Latino Faculty Staff Association. One student was so emotional that she cried throughout her "speech" as she sought to "educate" faculty and staff about the importance of the Chicano/a identity. Her loss of control--I hate to say it--eroded the power of her words. Was she "wrong" for losing control? Was her loss of control purposely orchestrated to garner sympathy for her position? In what ways can youth use their presentation of self to elicit the most support for their cause?

    ReplyDelete